Legal Opinion

Zink v. Zink

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1914No. 8,385PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Sarah A. Zink against Edward Zink. Prom a judgment for defendant upon his eross-eomplaint, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.

This was an action for divorce. Appellant filed a complaint against appellee in which she asked a divorce and settlement of all financial matters between the parties, and that appellee be required to state specifically certain pretended claims which he held against her.

*6781. The questions presented by this appeal arise upon the thirteenth paragraph of appellee’s cross-complaint and the fourteenth paragraph of answer thereto. The thirteenth paragraph of cross-complaint was for money furnished to appellant to pay off a mortgage on her separate real estate, which she had agreed to repay to appellee.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eve v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Conner v. Andrews Land, Home & Improvement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Welch v. State, ex rel. BeauchampIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Douglas v. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Borror v. CarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Crivaro v. RaderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Johnson v. BeboutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Shay v. GoinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Grevenstuk v. HubenyIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API