Legal Opinion

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Knopf

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1996No. 987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

This appeal involves questions concerning a title insurance company’s obligation to defend its insureds. It marks the second attempt by the insurer, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (“Lawyers Title”), to obtain review by this Court of the trial court’s rulings on the insurer’s separate motions for summary judgment against two insureds and the insureds’ separate motions for partial summary judgment.

Facts

We declined to consider the first appeal, brought immediately after the trial court’s rulings on the motions, because the orders appealed from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Chantel Associates v. Mount Vernon Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Northern Assurance Co. of America v. EDP Floors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Klein v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Back Creek Partners, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Chicago Title Ins. v. JenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API