Legal Opinion
Houston Pipeline Co. LP v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2007No. Bankruptcy No. 01-16045 (AJG); Adversary Pro. No. 03-93372PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT
ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiffs move for leave to amend their Second Amended Adversary Complaint (“SAAC”) and file a proposed Third Amended Adversary Complaint and to take additional discovery. The proposed Third Amended Adversary Complaint does not assert additional claims but contains additional factual allegations concerning the claims that currently exist in the SAAC. Although more fully set forth below, the underlying proceeding can be briefly summarized as follows: the Plaintiffs entered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. PettaTexas Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. ObertingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. ObertingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.