Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Chapter 11
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint in the above-captioned civil antitrust action that challenges the merger between American Airlines and U.S. Airways, (the “Motion”) (ECF No. 91).1
The Motion proposes a number of changes. First, the Plaintiffs seek to add factual allegations, some that relate to events before consummation of the merger in December 2013 while others involve subsequent events. See generally Proposed - First Amended Complaint (the “PAC”) (ECF No. 91 Ex. 4). Second, the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Dickert v North Coast Family HealthDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Fjord v. Amr Corp. (In re Amr Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- SunEdison, Inc., - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- SunEdison, Inc., - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021