Legal Opinion
Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 4, 1993No. 936, Docket 92-7989PublishedCited by 513 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Saverio D. Ruffolo appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Shirley Wohl Kram, Judge, dismissing the complaint against defendants Oppenheimer & Company (“Oppenheimer”) and Anthony G. Caserta pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the ground that it failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and denying leave to file an amended complaint. The court also dismissed the action against Caserta pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) on the ground that Ruffolo had failed to effect proper service of the summons and complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lettie D. Evans v. Syracuse City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Mario Ronzani v. Sanofi S.A., Sanofi Incorporated, and Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Health-Chem Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Billard v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by513 opinions
- Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Grace v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Conboy v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Davila v. LangDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
508 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.