Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 15, 2008No. 05 Civ 6430(VM)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Bridgeport Music Inc. and Southfield Music Inc., (collectively “Bridgeport”) brought this action alleging that defendants UMG Recording Inc., Napster, LLC, Apple Computer, Inc., and Yahoo!, Inc. (collectively “UMG”) infringed Bridgeport’s copyrights to certain musical compositions by, among other means, permitting electronic copying of the works at issue. Following a ruling by the Court resolving a dispute concerning UMG’s alleged unauthorized streamlining of the compositions, Bridgeport moved to file a second amended…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Soroof Trading Development Co. v. Ge Microgen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Hai Yang Liu v. 88 Harborview Realty, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Shulman v. Chaitman LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Uni-World Capital L.P. v. Preferred Fragrance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API