Legal Opinion

Fliegel v. Sheeran

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 19, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BROCHIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Diane M. Fliegel, administratrix, filed a complaint seeking a declaration that she has a valid lien against real property of defendants Vincent and Dallas Sheeran. The Chancery Division entered an order for summary judgment2 dismissing her complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

*521The limited record on the basis of which the summary judgment was granted shows the following facts:

On February 28, 1990, a grantor unrelated to this lawsuit conveyed a tract of land in Bergen County, New Jersey, to a grantee identified by the deed of conveyance…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Jackson v. HooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Palamarg Realty Company v. RehacSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Grober v. KahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  5. Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Panetta v. Equity One, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Ernest Bock & Sons-Dobco Pennsauken Joint Venture v. Township of PennsaukenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2023
  3. STEVEN BATITSAS VS. PARK POINT INVESTORS, LLC (L-3156-16, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API