American Asphalt & Grading Co. v. CMX, L.L.C.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUTINEL, Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 38.1(e) requires the superior court to “promptly notify counsel in writing of the placing of cases on the Inactive Calendar.” We hold that a notice issued several months prior to placing the case on the Inactive Calendar does not comply with this rule.
I
¶ 2 In April 2008, American Asphalt and Grading Company (“American Asphalt”) sued CMX, L.L.C., for professional negligence and breach of implied warranty. On October 1, 2008, the Maricopa County Superior Court issued an order (“150-Day Order”) informing American Asphalt that if it did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cockerham v. ZikratchArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Jepson v. NewArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Copeland v. Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum & Exposition CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State of Arizona Ex Rel R Romley v. Hon BallingerArizona Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Asphalt & Grading v. Cmx, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Contreras v. BourkeArizona Supreme Court · 2025
- Dominguez v. National ShotcreteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean ElectionArizona Supreme Court · 2018