Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Bourke

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2025No. CV-24-0217-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ROGER H. CONTRERAS, Appellee, v. NANCY BOURKE, Appellant. No. CV-24-0217-PR Filed August 21, 2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Cochise County The Honorable Timothy B. Dickerson, Judge (Retired) No. DO200901390 REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division Two

258 Ariz. 223

(App. 2024) VACATED COUNSEL: Danette R. Pahl (argued), Pahl & Associates, Tucson, Attorney for Roger H. Contreras Nancy Bourke (argued), In Propria Persona CONTRERAS V. BOURKE Opinion of the Court JUSTICE CRUZ authored the Opinion of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MedinaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cockerham v. ZikratchArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API