Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The plaintiff, legally authorized, issued to A. W. Byrne & Son of Hartford, a compensation policy insuring them against claims made by employees for injuries or death caused under circumstances arising out of and in the course of their employment. On August 2d, 1922, one Tromba, in the employ of A. W. Byrne & Son, suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, in a collision between a truck he was riding on and a train of defendant railroad. Tromba made a claim for compensation against his employer, A. W. Byrne & Son, and pursuant to its policy of insurance and with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Cedar Valley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Book v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Rosenbaum v. Hartford News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Hartford Trust Co. v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Renner v. Model Laundry, Cleaning & Dyeing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sweat v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Skitromo v. Meriden Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Western Maryland Railway Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Whitney v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Disbrow v. Deering Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.