Renner v. Model Laundry, Cleaning & Dyeing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Black I-Iawk District Court. — GeoRGE W. Dunham, Judge. Action at law to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Statute. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. . The material facts are stated in the opinion.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaveR, J.
servant: workmen’s Compensation Act: right agafnít °tMrdn paiiy. On July 25, 1917, A. B. Bodine, since deceased, was an employee in the service of the defendant laundry company, and in pursuance of such employment was driving a laundry wagon in the streets of the city of Waterloo. While he was thus engaged, a col- ,. n , , n ^ . . lision occurred between the wagon and a street ear operated by the Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Company. In this collision, Bodine was severely injured. Soon after the injury, the insurance carrier, the Fidelity and Casualty Company, undertook to pay the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Matheson v. O'KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Leddy v. BarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Walker v. Speeder MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Greiner v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Rich v. Dyna Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.