Legal Opinion

Gullo-Haas Toyota v. DAVIDSON EAGLESSON

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 5, 1992No. 01-91-01468-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Davidson, Eagleson & Co, the appellee, filed a motion to require the appellants to increase the amount of the security for the judgment. There are 12 appellants in this case, with different amounts due under the trial court’s judgment. The appellee contends the appellants owe the following amounts, which include the principal amount in the judgment and pre-judgment interest: Gullo-Haas Toyota, Inc. ($19,-287.93); Gullo-Haas Toyota Employee Profit Sharing Plan ($5,512.37); Gullo-Haas Children’s Trust ($5,025.37); Gullo-Haas Management, Inc. ($8,386.45); G & H Cattle Co. ($9,571.43);…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fortune v. McElhenneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. C & H NATIONWIDE, INC. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Lowe v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  4. Law Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. v. Slosburg Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  5. Transamerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API