Legal Opinion

Transamerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 25, 1995No. 04-95-00365-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLEE’S MOTION TO ENFORCE AUGUST 16, 1995 BOND ORDER

DUNCAN, Justice.

We have before us the motion of Hubert S. Finkelstein, appellee, to enforce our order of August 16, 1995 regarding the supersedeas bond filed by appellants, TransAmerican Natural Gas Corporation (“TransAmerican”) and TransTexas Gas Corporation (“Trans-Texas”). TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, 905 S.W.2d 412 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, mot.), pet. for review dism’d as moot, 38 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 1192 (Sept. 16, 1995). For the reasons set forth below, we hold that appellants’ additional supersedeas bond fails…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ojeda v. Reed, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Transamerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  3. Cooper v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Brown & Root, Inc. v. DeSautellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Gullo-Haas Toyota v. DAVIDSON EAGLESSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LAMAR COUNTY ELEC. CO-OP. ASS'N v. Risinger, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. Lamar County Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. RisingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API