Legal Opinion

Law Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. v. Slosburg Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-02-00153-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

After an appeal was filed, Slosburg Company, Gibraltar Construction Company, and Texas SFI Partnership 24 Limited (collectively appellees), filed a motion to “Determine Adequacy of Supersedeas Bond.” Appellees’ motion requests that this Court order Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (Law), to “provide additional security for the post-judgment interest likely to accrue on the judgment.”

The trial court has continuing jurisdiction to review the sufficiency of a bond on any party’s motion. Tex.R.App. P. 24.3(a); see Tex.R.App. P. 24.1(b)(2). We cannot review the trial court’s…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Hi-Plains Truck Brokers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  2. Lowe v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  3. Gullo-Haas Toyota v. DAVIDSON EAGLESSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bridget Hunter v. Bel Mandalay Limited Partner D/B/A Mandalay at Shadow Lake, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Glenn Johnson v. William Villatoro, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  3. Jose Angel Landaverde v. Joe D. Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  4. in Re: General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. in Re: General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API