Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 1, 1990No. 7670PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff, Peter C. Kores, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal for lack of aggrievement. He claims that the court erred in finding that he was not a statutorily aggrieved party and hence could not pursue a zoning appeal.
The New Hartford planning and zoning commission granted a special exception for the operation of a consulting business in a rented residence located at the corner of West Hill and Burwell Roads in New Hart*342ford, and owned by Susan E. Manizza.1 The original plaintiff, Julia M. Fuller, owned a residence on Bur-Well Road across the street from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Smith v. Planning & Zoning Board of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- McNally v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Northeast Parking, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- R & R Pool & Home, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rudewicz v. GagneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Wing v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.