Legal Opinion

Prunckun v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social Services Oldham v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social Services

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 3, 2019No. 93, 2018 & 94, 2018PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALIHURA, Justice:

I. Overview

Ashlee Oldham ("Ashlee") and Robert Prunckun ("Robert") (collectively, "Recipients") are the only two Delaware Medicaid recipients housed at Judge Rotenberg Center ("JRC"), a facility in Massachusetts and the only facility in the United States known to use a skin-shocking device, namely a graduated electronic decelerator ("GED"), on its residents. 1 GED delivers an electric current to an individual's skin, producing a voltage of 66v through the skin. Side effects, aside from the shock, include reddening of the skin, potentially lasting for days, blisters, and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blackston v. Delaware Department of Health and Social ServicesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026
  2. Delaware Solid Waste Authority v. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ControlSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021
  3. Diamond Town Tire Pros & Auto Care, LLC v. DNRECSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  4. Diamond Town Tire Pros & Auto Care, LLC v. DNRECSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  5. Gala v. BullockSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API