Legal Opinion

Manemann v. West

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1944No. 33,695PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is an action to rescind and cancel a deed given in consideration of a promise to' support the grantor and her minor son. The court ordered cancellation and gave plaintiff judgment for $1,065.86. The appeal is from the judgment and an order denying defendants’ motion for amended findings or a new trial. ' Only the order denying a new trial is appealable.

The land involved is a 245-acre farm in Lyon county. In 1989, plaintiff, a widow, was the owner in fee and resided thereon with two sons, Roy, who operated the farm, and Charles, who was then 12 years old. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Wilfong v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Haataja v. SaarenpaaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Priebe v. SetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Dietz v. DietzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API