Legal Opinion

Wilfong v. Johnson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1895PublishedCited by 27 opinions

I.—-Answers, S¡‘c. can only be filed at rides or in Court.—88 W. Ya. 409, II.—Reversal for want of necessary parties.—10 W. Va. 1; 10 W. Va. 59; 4 W. Va. 531; 4 W. Va. 571; 11 W. Vu. 175; 21 W. Va. 2; 21 W. Va. 124; 83 W. Va. 155. III.— Compromises favored, in law.—1 Parson’s Con. Bk. 2, § 4, p. 438; 1 Ves.

Read the full summary

I.—-Answers, S¡‘c. can only be filed at rides or in Court.—88 W. Ya. 409, II.—Reversal for want of necessary parties.—10 W. Va. 1; 10 W. Va. 59; 4 W. Va. 531; 4 W. Va. 571; 11 W. Vu. 175; 21 W. Va. 2; 21 W. Va. 124; 83 W. Va. 155. III.— Compromises favored, in law.—1 Parson’s Con. Bk. 2, § 4, p. 438; 1 Ves. Sr. 444; 6 Munf. 406; 2 Rand. 442. cited 8 W. Va. 291; 10 W. Ya. 298; 12 W. Ya. 371; 8 W. Va. 174; 20 S. E. Hop. 899; Sand, Suit Eq. 694, 695; 38 W. Ya. 409; 11 W. Va. 511; 18 W. Va. 693; 22 W. Va. 444.

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, I’resident:

On appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Tucker county entered on the 24th day of June, 1893, affirming a decree of 27th November, 1891, which set aside a deed for fifty six acres of land made by Wilfong and wife to S. O. Johnson.

Plaintiff Sarah E. Wilfong and defendant S. 0. Johnson are son and daughter of defendant Richard P. Johnson. Richard P. Johnson and his wife were old and infirm, with no means of support, and unable to maintain themselves by labor. The son S. O. Johnson, agreed with his sister, S. E. Wilfong, to furnish the support for R. P. Johnson; and, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Kable v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Zane v. FinkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Green v. BatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Hale v. BoylenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. GoldsmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Baughman v. HoffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Abbott v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  5. Bowlby v. De WitWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API