Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Russell v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1982No. SC 28198PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*314TANZER, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. We take the facts from the alternative writ and supporting documents. Plaintiff is the defendant in an underlying criminal prosecution. (Hereafter he is referred to as “defendant.”) He entered a no contest plea to a felony charge of sexual abuse in the first degree. Apparently a presentence investigation was ordered to be performed by the Multnomah County Diagnostic Center. That agency requested the defendant to appear for interviews, including a psychological interview, but refused as a matter of practice to permit the defendant’s attorney to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Buchea v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API