Legal Opinion

In Re Blatt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 23, 1964PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

A complaint was filed with the Atlantic County Ethics Committee against the respondent attorney, Martin L. Blatt. Following a formal hearing, the committee filed a presentment charging respondent with violation of Canons 6 and 37 of the Canons of Professional Ethics. This Court issued an order to show cause why respondent should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined.

At the hearing before the Atlantic County Ethics Committee the following facts appeared:

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this State in 1959, and since that time has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. In Re PalmieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Gray v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. In Re GarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API