Legal Opinion

Thomas Affinito v. Roy Hendricks Attorney General of the State of New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 4, 2004No. 01-2066PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Thomas Affinito was convicted in 1988 of murder and kidnapping in New Jersey state court. After exhausting his state court remedies, Affinito petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court denied Affinito’s petition. We granted a certificate of ap-pealability as to whether Affinito received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial. While we conclude that Affinito’s counsel failed to provide effective assistance, that failure was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kenneth T. Richey v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Davis v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2007
  3. DURN v. RozumDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Affinito v. Hendricks, Administrator, New Jersey State PrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Hunt v. PiazzaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API