Legal Opinion

United States v. One Hudson Hornet Sedan

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 5, 1953No. Civ. A. 284PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKSDALE, District Judge.

This action, by stipulation, has -been submitted to the court without a jury upon the libel of information, the petition of claimant, Aubrey K. Ferrell, certain stipulated facts, and the written statements of witnesses for both the United States and the petitioner, to be taken as their evidence. I therefore find the facts specially, and state separately my conclusions of law, as follows:

Findings of Fact.

Prior to February 8, 1952, the automobile here in controversy was the property of claimant, Aubrey K. Ferrell, a certificate of title having theretofore been issued…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Thomas v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. StormSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  2. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. TrussellDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962
  3. Frank W. Wicker v. National Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Myers Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API