Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1944No. 10736PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The United States petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, directing the Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, to assume jurisdiction over the case of United States v. 1,960 Acres of Land in Riverside County, California, No. 2567 — PH (54 F.Supp. 867). For reasons which he regards as compelling Judge Hall refuses to take jurisdiction. This court issued its order to Judge Hall requiring him to show cause why the requested writ should not issue, and he has made his return. The facts herein…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. City of Fort Worth v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Bowles v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. David K. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. William Robert WrigleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API