Legal Opinion

United States v. William Robert Wrigley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1975No. 75-1235PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

William Robert Wrigley was charged by indictment with knowingly making false material declarations before a grand jury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. He pleaded not guilty. By motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b), he challenged the authority of Special Attorneys Philip J. Adams, Jr. and Gary T. Cornwell, both full-time government attorneys of the Department of Justice, to conduct the grand jury proceedings from which the indictment issued. The defendant asserted, and the District Court held, that the special attorneys were not “attorneys for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Ronald F. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Dominic AlessioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Michael Santo Polizzi v. United States of America, Emprise Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API