Parello v. McKinney
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
At issue here is whether legislation eliminating a legislatively created cause of action may be applied retroactively to a claim that accrued prior to the repeal. This issue is often difficult and has been subject to various tests and legal standards for decades. In this case, by amendment to a section of the State Building Code, G. L. c. 143, the legislation in question created strict liability against
“[a]ny person who obtains a permit pursuant to the state *786building code to erect, construct, or demolish a building or structure ... for all injuries and damages that result from a failure to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- City Council of Waltham v. VinciulloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dupont v. Chief of Police of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. KefalasMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
- Curtin-Wilding v. Trustees of Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Indian Hill Associates, Inc. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
- Lewis v. WalcottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999