Legal Opinion

Parello v. McKinney

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 21, 1999No. 96-P-1582PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

At issue here is whether legislation eliminating a legislatively created cause of action may be applied retroactively to a claim that accrued prior to the repeal. This issue is often difficult and has been subject to various tests and legal standards for decades. In this case, by amendment to a section of the State Building Code, G. L. c. 143, the legislation in question created strict liability against

“[a]ny person who obtains a permit pursuant to the state *786building code to erect, construct, or demolish a building or structure ... for all injuries and damages that result from a failure to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. City Council of Waltham v. VinciulloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dupont v. Chief of Police of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. KefalasMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  3. Curtin-Wilding v. Trustees of Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  4. Indian Hill Associates, Inc. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  5. Lewis v. WalcottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API