Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Kefalas

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 14, 1999No. 917274PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff in this case, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), seeks entry of judgment following two jury verdicts in its favor, one establishing the liability of defendant John H. Refalas and the other establishing that certain transfers from Mr. Refalas to his wife, Alice, were fraudulent. In addition, the FDIC seeks recovery of attorneys fees and costs claiming that the opposition of Mr. and Mrs. Refalas to its fraudulent-transfer claims was wholly insubstantial, frivolous and not advanced in good faith. See G.L.c. 231, §6F.

Defendants oppose the motion for entry of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. CameronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Admiral Metals Servicenter Co. v. Micromatic Products Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API