Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

St. Germaine v. Pendergast

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, Francis X. St. Germaine, III (Kip), 3 brought an action in the Superior Court against the defendant, Michael E. Pendergast, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries received when a wall being erected in connection with the construction of a single family home for Pendergast fell on him. 4 Kip’s parents, the plaintiffs Francis X. St. Germaine, Jr., and Bette J. St. Germaine (St. Germaines), sought in the action to recover for the loss of filial consortium of their son pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 85X (1990 ed.), from Pendergast and his employer, Lacey & Lacey.

As far as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Lyon v. MorphewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Gabbidon v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Glidden v. MaglioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API