Legal Opinion

City Council of Waltham v. Vinciullo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 20, 1974PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

The city council of Waltham (council) filed a bill in equity by way of appeal from a decision of the board of appeals of Waltham (board) granting a zoning variance requested by the Vinciullos (defendants). The bill was filed on July 14, 1969, pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 21, as amended through St. 1960, c. 365. On August 9, 1971, after a trial, a Superior Court judge ruled that there had been no showing of substantial hardship especially affecting the property in question, within the meaning of G. L. c. 40A, § 15, which would result from enforcement of the zoning regulations. The judge…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Smith v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Kagan v. United Vacuum Appliance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Blackman v. Board of Appeals of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. MacCormack v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Warren v. Zoning Board of Appeals of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API