Michael v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
In this case, a petitioner claims to have been convicted in the superior court of crimes not charged in his indictment. The court of appeals ruled otherwise and affirmed petitioner’s conviction. Michael v. State, 767 P.2d 193 (Alaska App.1988). We reverse.
I
Steven and Loreli Michael were charged by an Anchorage grand jury with thirteen counts of assault in the first degree. 1 Each count of their joint indictment alleged that the defendants,
either personally or as a person ... legally accountable for the conduct of another, did unlawfully and intentionally [i.e.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. James J. PazsintCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Cummiskey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- McKillop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
- Hansen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
- Wassillie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.