Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1979No. 3067PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABIN-OWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BURKE, Justice.

Phillip J. Adams was convicted of mayhem at the conclusion of a bench trial. On appeal he maintains that the speedy trial requirements of Rule 45, Alaska R.Crim.P., were violated; and he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury and at trial. We hold that the grand jury had insufficient evidence to indict Adams and reverse his conviction.

On August 28, 1975, Adams was arrested by an Anchorage police officer, Eugene Parmeter. The arrest was made after Parmeter saw Adams…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Fuller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Putnam v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Preston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  5. Castillo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API