McKillop v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
A jury found Jon B. McKillop guilty of harassment, AS 11.61.120(a)(4), for making anonymous telephone calls to the Anchorage Abused Women’s Aid in Crisis (AWA-IC) shelter. McKillop appeals his conviction, asserting that his conviction rests on illegally seized evidence, that the trial judge misinstructed the jury on the meaning of “anonymous”, and that the harassment statute is unconstitutional. We hold that the statute is constitutional if construed to require proof that the defendant’s sole intent was to annoy or harass the recipient of the telephone call, but we…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Turney v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.