Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 30, 2010No. 1080880PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Justice.
Anthony Rogers petitioned for certiorari review after the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment denying his claim for unemployment-compensation benefits. We granted certiorari review to reconsider prior Alabama decisions holding that the claimant has the burden of proving the *774absence of a disqualification for misconduct.
Facts and Procedural History
Rogers was employed by Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., for several years as a customer-service representative. His duties included pumping fuel into trucks leased to Penske’s customers. Rogers was accused of helping Christopher…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Brown Hotel Company v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Petrovic v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Dates v. Frank Norton, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
- Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Select Specialty Hospitals, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning & Development AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.