Legal Opinion

Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 2016No. 1141230 and 1141267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Justice.

Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. (“Har-Mar Collisions”), appeals from a judgment of the Mobile Circuit Court (“the trial court”) following a jury verdict of $101,054.40 in favor of Har-Mar Collisions on its breach-of-contract claim against Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”). The trial court offset the jury verdict by the amounts Har-Mar Collisions had recovered from a settlement agreement it had entered into with Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Owners Insurance Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Auto-Owners”) and from a settlement agreement it had entered into…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ex Parte Miltope CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Alabama State University v. DanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Classroomdirect. Com, LLC v. DRAPHIX, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Clemons v. MallettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  2. Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. Norvell v. NorvellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  4. Alyssa Verhage, et al. v. PowerGrid Services LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
  5. Ex parte J.W.B.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API