Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Smitherman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), is the defendant in an action pending in the Etowah Circuit Court. Wal-Mart moved for a summary judgment on the plaintiff Gail Smitherman's retaliatory-discharge claim. The circuit court denied the motion. We have granted Wal-Mart permission, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., to appeal from the interlocutory order denying Wal-Mart's motion for a summary judgment.
Wal-Mart argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a summary judgment because, it asserts, Smitherman's retaliatory-discharge claim is barred by the doctrine of collateral…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Young v. La Quinta Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Hightower and Co., Inc. v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Lee L. Saad Constr. Co. v. DPF Architects, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Middleton v. Caterpillar Indus., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Matthews v. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.