Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Smitherman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 17, 1999No. 1971085PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), is the defendant in an action pending in the Etowah Circuit Court. Wal-Mart moved for a summary judgment on the plaintiff Gail Smitherman's retaliatory-discharge claim. The circuit court denied the motion. We have granted Wal-Mart permission, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., to appeal from the interlocutory order denying Wal-Mart's motion for a summary judgment.

Wal-Mart argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a summary judgment because, it asserts, Smitherman's retaliatory-discharge claim is barred by the doctrine of collateral…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Young v. La Quinta Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Hightower and Co., Inc. v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Lee L. Saad Constr. Co. v. DPF Architects, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Middleton v. Caterpillar Indus., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Matthews v. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API