Kridler v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
This is a suit for personal injuries received in a one-car accident. Liability is claimed solely under express and implied warranties made in connection with the sale of the car. After extensive deliberation the jury failed to come to a verdict and we now consider motions of Defendants for a directed verdict and for verdict or judgment notwithstanding the failure of the jury to arrive at a verdict. Defendants argue that the evidence of any defective condition in the automobile was not sufficient to allow the case to be submitted to the jury and, more specifically,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Smail v. FlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Lanza v. PorettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Kridler v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kridler v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970