Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hyde

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. 16276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Bob and Steve Hyde (Hydes) appeal a judgment declaring the termination of their lease interest in certain farmland.

Facts

In 1967, Eileen Gerken (Gerken) acquired a quarter section of farmland in Sully County, South Dakota. She lived on the farmstead on the property and rented out the farmland. Under a five-year written lease, Gerken cash rented the farmland to Hydes in 1981.1 The lease expired on December 24, 1986. In September of 1986, Hydes informally spoke with Gerken on the main street of Onida, South Dakota. Gerken told Hydes that she was considering selling the property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Valley Bank v. DowdySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Peterson v. RogersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bolzer v. HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. GulbransenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Zwart v. PenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Jacobson v. GulbransenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Scott v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Shepherd Seed Co. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc.United States District Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API