Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Rogers

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 14250PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the defendants in a negligent misrepresentation action. We affirm.

Carol M. Rich, Katherine Eichacher, and Linda T. Larson are the owners of certain farmland north of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Under a series of written leases extending over a twelve-year period, the owners leased the land to appellants Ivan and Beverly Peterson. The final lease expired in March of 1981.

During 1980, the owners hired Emmett Rogers to manage the property. Rogers was given “free rein” in the management; he received no specific instructions from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hughes-Johnson Co. v. Dakota Midland HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lee v. BeaucheneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Littau v. Midwest Commodities, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Boos v. ClaudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Laber v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. GridleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fisher v. KahlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rumpza v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API