Legal Opinion

Bolzer v. Hamilton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1960No. File 9769PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P.J.

Plaintiff in this action sought an injunction to -restrain defendant from entering uipon -a described 640' acres of farm land in Bennett County. The ■basis for the relief as pleaded by the plaintiff is that he had a leasehold interest and possession by virtue of a written lea-se dated March 14, 19-55, for a five-year period terminating February 28, 1961, and that defendant claiming an interest in the premises adverse to the plaintiff entered thereon with farming equipment and declared it his intention to assume possession. The -court found generally in favor of the defendant; that plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. VakNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tuthill v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Peterson v. VakNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Vance v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Scott v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Scott v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API