Legal Opinion

Bornhoft v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1956No. 468-55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiff sues (1) for $4,602.41 “for traveling 17,208 miles on Official Government Business”,; (2) for $74,269.20 “for permanent damage to the [his] right eye, arm and leg”; and (3) for $2,000,000 for damage to his reputation.

Instead of making a motion to dismiss, because the second and third items sound in tort, and because the facts alleged to *135support the first are manifestly insufficient to state a cause of action, defendant has made a motion for summary judgment, which it supports by affidavits and documents. These show that plaintiff is possibly entitled to recover on one small item. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Remaley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Ronka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  2. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API