Legal Opinion

City of Petaluma v. County of Sonoma

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1993No. A054641PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

I. Introduction

In the published portions of this opinion, we address certain legal issues raised by a dispute between a city and a county, concerning the provision of emergency medical services to areas within the county, but outside the city.

II. Procedural History and Facts

The City of Petaluma (City) appeals from a judgment construing two sections of the Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act (EMS Act) (Health & Saf. Code, 1 § 1797 et seq.) in favor of Sonoma County (County) and its Public Health Department Emergency…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Milligan v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospitals Assn. v. RandolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Service Employees International Union Local 715 v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Smith v. Santa Rosa Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. American National Insurance v. LowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. California Highway Patrol v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API