Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1918No. 14732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Carey, J., entered September 17, 3917, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a fall upon a defective street.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— Respondents allege as a cause of action:

“That on, and long prior to, the 2d day of January, 1917, the defendant negligently permitted and maintained a manhole covering in Post street, at the south*315east corner of Main avenne, in said city, within the lines (extended) of the sidewalk on the south side of said Main avenue; which covering was of rounded surface, which surface had by long use and travel thereupon and thereover become smooth and slippery; which slipperiness was increased by water, ice, or snow thereon.
“That, by reason of said rounded surface and by reason of said smoothness and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Piper v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. DeLor v. SymonsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Smith v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API