Thornton v. Eneroth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is a second appeal after a third trial of the case. On the former appeal, reported in 176 Wash. 1, 30 P. (2d) 951, the case was heard Bn Banc after a second hearing, and the facts may be there found. It is unnecessary to again detail them here.
On a retrial, the jury awarded a verdict in favor of respondent against appellants Eneroth and Harrison in,the sum of $13,778. Harrison paid five thousand dollars and one-half of the costs in partial satisfaction of the judgment, and has not appealed. Eneroth and wife alone appeal. It was stipulated by all parties that the payment of a portion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- White v. JansenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Blair v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Seattle v. Department of Public UtilitiesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Case v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Miller v. Gooding Highway Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- O'Connell v. Home Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.