Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Eneroth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1934No. 25338. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is a second appeal after a third trial of the case. On the former appeal, reported in 176 Wash. 1, 30 P. (2d) 951, the case was heard Bn Banc after a second hearing, and the facts may be there found. It is unnecessary to again detail them here.

On a retrial, the jury awarded a verdict in favor of respondent against appellants Eneroth and Harrison in,the sum of $13,778. Harrison paid five thousand dollars and one-half of the costs in partial satisfaction of the judgment, and has not appealed. Eneroth and wife alone appeal. It was stipulated by all parties that the payment of a portion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. White v. JansenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Blair v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. Department of Public UtilitiesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Case v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Miller v. Gooding Highway Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. O'Connell v. Home Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API