Legal Opinion
Artisst v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1989No. 87-536PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Appellant Anthony Joseph Artisst challenges his conviction, after a trial by jury, of unlawful entry. He contends that the government presented insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and that he was denied a fair trial because a juror, on voir dire, failed to disclose that she knew him. We find that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, but that the trial court erred in failing to pursue appellant’s suggestions at trial, and his allegations after trial, that a juror had failed to disclose her acquaintance with him. Accordingly, we remand for a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Stack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wesby v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Devonshire v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Adam Jaramillo Ortberg v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.