Legal Opinion
Adam Jaramillo Ortberg v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2013No. 11-CM-1154 & 12-CO-874PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERLY, Associate Judge:
Adam Jaramillo Ortberg challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction under D.C.Code § 22-3302(a) (2012 Repl.) for unlawful entry of “any private dwelling, building, or other property5’ or part thereof. Mr. Ortberg admits he entered a room at the W Hotel, “Studio One,” that was being used for an invitation-only fundraiser for a member of the United States House of Representatives, and he admits that he did so to engage in protest activity. But, Mr. Ortberg asserts, his entry was at most “opportunistic” and was not “clearly ‘unlawful,5 55 because…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Roy L. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Shelton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Leiss v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Wesby v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Wesby v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.