Hill v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
It is a salutary and perhaps even common practice for trial judges in criminal cases, when appropriate, to instruct jurors to suppress any temptation they may have to visit the location of the alleged crime on their own. The trial judge regretted not having done so in this case, for, as it happened, a juror ventured out to the scene of the alleged drug sale the night before deliberations began to examine the lighting conditions. Appellant’s defense was mis-identification, and, as the trial judge later acknowledged, the lighting was “important, even central” to at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Medrano-Quiroz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Al-Mahdi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.