Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whiting

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1986No. 02956PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for burglary and conspiracy. Appellant contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying his request for new counsel and (2) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to (a) object to the trial court’s questioning of appellant; (b) object to the trial court’s missing witness instruction; (c) object to the Commonwealth’s introduction of hearsay evidence; and (d) call a police detective to impeach Commonwealth witnesses through the use of prior inconsistent statements. For the reasons that follow, we remand to the trial court for an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. HaidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API