Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Haideman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 1972No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Robebts,
Appellant, George Haideman, was tried by a jury and found guilty of bookmaldng, setting up a gambling establishment and conspiracy. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for six to twenty-three months and to pay a fine of $500.00. Following a per curiam affirmance by the Superior Court, we granted allocatur and, in a per curiam order, affirmed the conviction by an equally divided Court. Commonwealth v. Haide-
man, 284 A. 2d 757 (1971). On March 21, 1972, however, we granted appellant’s motion for reargument.
The issue 2 presented is whether the trial court erred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Raymond R. Fowle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MaloneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.