Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1990No. 1188PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case we are called upon to determine whether a second PCRA petition 1 must be reviewed under the standard of Commonwealth v. Lawson, 519 Pa. 504, 549 A.2d 107 (1988), when the second PCRA petition is identical to a first PCRA petition dismissed on grounds of procedural default, except in raising a claim of ineffectiveness with respect to prior PCRA counsel’s procedural default. We find that a second petition must be treated as a first petition nunc pro tunc in such circumstances, and falls outside the ambit of the restrictive standard for review of second or subsequent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. FluhartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. PriovolosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. PetroskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API