Commonwealth v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this case we are called upon to determine whether a second PCRA petition 1 must be reviewed under the standard of Commonwealth v. Lawson, 519 Pa. 504, 549 A.2d 107 (1988), when the second PCRA petition is identical to a first PCRA petition dismissed on grounds of procedural default, except in raising a claim of ineffectiveness with respect to prior PCRA counsel’s procedural default. We find that a second petition must be treated as a first petition nunc pro tunc in such circumstances, and falls outside the ambit of the restrictive standard for review of second or subsequent…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. FluhartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. PriovolosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PetroskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.