Legal Opinion
Hooks v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 21, 2012No. Case No. 3:12-cv-01691-SIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SIMON, District Judge.
This action arises from a dispute at Terminal 6 at the Port of Portland concerning the work of plugging in, unplugging, and monitoring refrigerated shipping containers (the “reefer work”). The International Longshore and Warehouse Union (“ILWU”) and the Pacific Maritime Association (“PMA”) contend that their collective bargaining agreement — the Pacific Coast Longshore Contract Document (“PCLCD”) — requires ICTSI Oregon, Inc. (“ICTSI”), the operator of Terminal 6 and a PMA member, to assign the reefer work to ILWU members. ICTSI, the Port of Portland…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013