Legal Opinion
International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 15, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-cv-01058-SIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SIMON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is one of six separate but related actions arising from a labor dispute at Terminal 6 at the Port of Portland.1 Briefly stated, the dispute concerns who is *1186entitled to perform the work of plugging in, unplugging, and monitoring refrigerated shipping containers (the “reefer work”) at Terminal 6. Plaintiffs International Longshore and Warehouse Union (“ILWU”) and the Pacific Maritime Association (“PMA”) contend that their collective bargaining agreement — the Pacific Coast Longshore Contract Document (“PCLCD”) — requires Defendant…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Locals 8 & 40 v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Samson Tug and Barge Co., Inc v. International Longshore and Warehouse UnionDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021